View previous topic | View next topic

prince albert (inland revenue)

Page 1 of 2
Goto page 1, 2  Next

'yorz
1166503.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:12 am Reply with quote

Play quoits with yourself?

 
swot
1166504.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:12 am Reply with quote

Oh look, there's a girl version.

 
bemahan
1166507.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:28 am Reply with quote

Surely the drawbacks of the women's (not going to make a pun about the men's version and drawbacks) outweigh the benefits? Unless, possibly, you spend more time orgasming than you do weeing.

 
suze
1166510.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:38 am Reply with quote

I wrote on the matter of whether Prince Albert did, in fact, have the adornment which is given his name at post 878575.

I tended to think that he probably didn't. But it's worth noting that The Lancet once ran an article which asserted that he did, and The Lancet does not normally source its stories in quite the same way as the Sunday Sport.

 
Bondee
1166512.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:41 am Reply with quote

bemahan wrote:
Surely the drawbacks of the women's (not going to make a pun about the men's version and drawbacks) outweigh the benefits? Unless, possibly, you spend more time orgasming than you do weeing.


You wouldn't know if you were coming or going!

 
'yorz
1166515.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:53 am Reply with quote

I begin to understand the attraction of Golden Showers.

 
bemahan
1166518.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 9:57 am Reply with quote

Bondee wrote:
bemahan wrote:
Surely the drawbacks of the women's (not going to make a pun about the men's version and drawbacks) outweigh the benefits? Unless, possibly, you spend more time orgasming than you do weeing.


You wouldn't know if you were coming or going!

Ba-dum tish!

 
adelaide129
1166584.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:40 pm Reply with quote

bemahan wrote:
Unless, possibly, you spend more time orgasming than you do weeing.


hahaha my kingdom for that life!

 
'yorz
1166586.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:41 pm Reply with quote

According to some ignoramuses, they're both one and the same.

 
adelaide129
1166587.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:42 pm Reply with quote

but also, i'm a bit concerned that we've got a misunderstanding about how the female orgasm works and where discharge comes from....you know the pee hole is its own thing, right?

 
'yorz
1166588.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:43 pm Reply with quote

See my post above yours.

 
adelaide129
1166589.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:44 pm Reply with quote

'yorz wrote:
See my post above yours.


haha yes, i would like to see QI spend an episode on reproduction and how lady bits work because it's too much of a mystery to too many....guess we'll have to wait for V series.

oh but also, do you think my original premise is correct?

 
bemahan
1166591.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 4:50 pm Reply with quote

adelaide129 wrote:
but also, i'm a bit concerned that we've got a misunderstanding about how the female orgasm works and where discharge comes from....you know the pee hole is its own thing, right?

Bondee was being punny and I was referring to the wiki entry and the possibility of infection of the urethra.
wiki wrote:
Princess Albertina is a female genital piercing, where a ring enters the urethra and exits through the top of the vagina.

 
adelaide129
1166593.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:03 pm Reply with quote

bemahan wrote:
adelaide129 wrote:
but also, i'm a bit concerned that we've got a misunderstanding about how the female orgasm works and where discharge comes from....you know the pee hole is its own thing, right?

Bondee was being punny and I was referring to the wiki entry and the possibility of infection of the urethra.
wiki wrote:
Princess Albertina is a female genital piercing, where a ring enters the urethra and exits through the top of the vagina.



oh i see! haha please forgive my misunderstanding. i can see how the golden showers joke works now too!

 
adelaide129
1166595.  Sun Jan 03, 2016 5:08 pm Reply with quote

oh i see my misunderstanding now!! i'm familiar with clitoral hood piercings but i didn't realize there was a version that actually resembled the prince albert entirely. i hadn't clicked on the wiki link because i assumed it was a hood piercing. sorry, moving on!

oh, but still...original premise? correct?

 

Page 1 of 2
Goto page 1, 2  Next

All times are GMT - 5 Hours


Display posts from previous:   

Search Search Forums

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group