View previous topic | View next topic

the race to 500-in roman numerals!

Page 1 of 3
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

dr bartolo
737339.  Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:37 pm Reply with quote

I got this idea from another forum.
here are thr rules
1-on person may post 2 times consequtively.
2-all counting musy be done with roman numerals(obviously!)

I'll start

I

 
Posital
737379.  Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:51 pm Reply with quote

D

I win.

 
Alfred E Neuman
737390.  Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:35 pm Reply with quote

Well, I'm glad we got through that successfully.

 
dr bartolo
737445.  Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:45 pm Reply with quote

good.at leastsomone knows what is the roman number for 500.
anyway , I have to addpone extra rule
the numbers have to be CONSEQUITIVE(e.g-I,II,III,IIII,V &c &c)
so, may I begin with
I
(note the original race had the numbers run to five thousand)

 
MinervaMoon
737452.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:48 am Reply with quote

dr bartolo, just note that these forums are limited in capacity and subject to regular pruning of old or irrelevant posts in order to keep free space open for true discussion of interesting things. While your enthusiasm for starting new threads has sparked some discussion, there really can be little more irrelevant a thread than a simple progression of numbers, and I've no doubt that a moderator would agree.

 
Alfred E Neuman
737511.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:15 am Reply with quote

I'm not playing until "consecutive" is spelled properly.

 
Efros
737516.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:22 am Reply with quote

You just did that.

I had CDXCIX, all ready...

 
Posital
737570.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:52 am Reply with quote

Quote:
CONSEQUITIVE(e.g-I,II,III,IIII,V &c &c)
IIII ?

Wonder which roman numeral that is... never clocked this one at the forum...

Praps I should look up the meaning of "CONSEQUITIVE"??

 
Alfred E Neuman
737587.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:14 am Reply with quote

Posital wrote:
IIII ?


That used to be used for four. And still is on clocks unless I am mistaken. I don't think I am this time...

 
tetsabb
737598.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:30 am Reply with quote

When I learned Latin (not long after it was deemed a 'dead' language) both IIII and IV were considered acceptable.
I suppose IV now means a drip in hospital to most people, or something that grows up old walls

 
Alfred E Neuman
737606.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:47 am Reply with quote

IV used to mean Jupiter, which is why they used IIII for four.

 
Posital
737619.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:14 pm Reply with quote

Oooo - so IV is a new-fangled invention... I might just buy myself a digital watch to celebrate...

 
Alfred E Neuman
737664.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 1:17 pm Reply with quote

I wonder if there's a market for a digital watch using roman numerals?

 
Posital
737693.  Sun Aug 29, 2010 2:41 pm Reply with quote


nuff sed

EDIT - to sort out image


Last edited by Posital on Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:15 am; edited 1 time in total

 
dr bartolo
737916.  Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:03 am Reply with quote

as if you thaught IIII was weied, another way of writing IX was VIIII-you can see this on some tarot decks....

 

Page 1 of 3
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are GMT - 5 Hours


Display posts from previous:   

Search Search Forums

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group