View previous topic | View next topic

Olympic 'blade runner' Oscar Pistorius shoots girlfriend

Page 13 of 14
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 12, 13, 14  Next

'yorz
1095040.  Sat Sep 20, 2014 5:35 pm Reply with quote

Take your pick. :-)

 
tetsabb
1095048.  Sat Sep 20, 2014 6:55 pm Reply with quote

 
Jenny
1095134.  Sun Sep 21, 2014 12:10 pm Reply with quote

Would a male judge who performed an action bobwilson disagreed with be called a prostitute?

To prostitute - the verb - can reasonably be held to be understood in the Merriam-Webster definition.

A prostitute - the noun - is not the same as a 'media whore' because it is not qualified in the same way by an adjective. A media whore is somebody who uses the media indiscriminately for gain. A prostitute is somebody who sells their sexual favours.

So what we have is a sloppy and inaccurate use of language. I suggest that bobwilson rethinks and edits the relevant section of his post to avoid making libellous statements, and I suggest that people who feel that their quoting of the remark may perpetuate this false statement consider editing their post to avoid that issue. I will revisit this thread in a day or two and delete anything I think is legally problematic.

 
filofax
1095225.  Mon Sep 22, 2014 4:34 am Reply with quote

Quote:
Would a male judge who performed an action bobwilson disagreed with be called a prostitute?


Why not? Male prostitutes exist.
Not that I agree with bobwilson's sentiment, but I don't think this is a gender issue.

 
Alfred E Neuman
1160982.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 7:45 am Reply with quote

The Supreme Court of Appeal has changed Oscar's conviction from culpable homicide to murder, and sent the case back to the trial court for re-sentencing. A conviction for murder carries a fifteen year minimum sentence, so one must assume he will be back in jail at some point.

 
Zziggy
1160984.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 7:52 am Reply with quote

Yes, the BBC says he "will be back behind bars, less than two months after he was placed under house arrest".

The reason they've given, I agree with. I never understood quite why it was a valid defence to say "well yeah I totally tried to kill somebody, and succeeded, but it wasn't who you think it was!"

 
bemahan
1160990.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 8:18 am Reply with quote

I'm a bit grumpy that he's going to be allowed to have Christmas at home, even if he is on house arrest. I do hope someone lets Santa know so he doesn't get shot as he comes down the chimney.
🎅🔫😱

 
Alfred E Neuman
1160997.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 8:54 am Reply with quote

I thought the SCA could just have done the re-sentencing themselves, but they're probably right in saying that the original trial court has the ability to do that. I don't know when it will be fitted in though, court dates are booked up quite a bit in advance around here.

 
bemahan
1160998.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:03 am Reply with quote

Oh, no! Should I be worrying about the Easter Bunny as well as Santa?

 
Alfred E Neuman
1161001.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:38 am Reply with quote

My guess is that it'll be done around Easter bunny time. I don't know if they need new arguments in mitigation now that the the court is considering a far more serious crime, but it would not surprise me if that's the next step. I'd be surprised if he gets more that the minimum of fifteen years though, as it wasn't pre-meditated.

 
AlmondFacialBar
1161004.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:43 am Reply with quote

bemahan wrote:
I'm a bit grumpy that he's going to be allowed to have Christmas at home, even if he is on house arrest. I do hope someone lets Santa know so he doesn't get shot as he comes down the chimney.
🎅🔫😱


Well there's always this option...


:-)

AlmondFacialBar

 
Alfred E Neuman
1161057.  Thu Dec 03, 2015 5:16 pm Reply with quote

You don't want to be going to the toilet when Oscar's anywhere near...

 
Alfred E Neuman
1264172.  Mon Nov 27, 2017 8:15 am Reply with quote

Alfred E Neuman wrote:
...I have a feeling it will be closer to the 15 years maximum sentence...


Alfred E Neuman wrote:
The Supreme Court of Appeal has changed Oscar's conviction from culpable homicide to murder, and sent the case back to the trial court for re-sentencing. A conviction for murder carries a fifteen year minimum sentence, so one must assume he will be back in jail at some point.


Last Friday, the Supreme Court of Appeal increased Oscarís sentence.

Quote:
On Friday morning, Justice Legoabe Willie Seriti increased Pistorius's sentence from six years to 13 years and five months in prison for the 2013 murder.

Seriti said Pistorius should have been sentenced to 15 years, but the SCA took into account the time he had already served.

In the judgment handed down, Seriti said Pistorius had offered no explanation for having fired the fatal shots through the door of his toilet.

After he had perused the High Court sentence, Sereti said he found that it had "overemphasised" Pistorius' personal circumstances and misdirected itself in its assessment of an appropriate sentence.

My bold - quoted from https://m.news24.com//SouthAfrica/News/pistorius-shows-lack-of-genuine-remorse-judge-20171124

I am pleased to see that the more senior judge agrees with me :-)

 
Jenny
1264223.  Mon Nov 27, 2017 2:13 pm Reply with quote

Alf for SCOTUS!

 
Alexander Howard
1264345.  Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:18 am Reply with quote

When the story first broke, I received a spam email selling a course on corporate PR. Its intro emphasised the commercial value of brand reputation and warned that it is fragile, as shown by the Oscar Pistorius.

The PR company no doubt thought they were on the button of topicality. I was ready to award them a prize for the most cynical exploitation of the tragic death of a young woman.

 

Page 13 of 14
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... , 12, 13, 14  Next

All times are GMT - 5 Hours


Display posts from previous:   

Search Search Forums

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group