View previous topic | View next topic

Is it just me is or is this utterly insane?

Page 6 of 7
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

tetsabb
906607.  Fri May 04, 2012 6:15 am Reply with quote

Written in ink, one hopes....

 
Neotenic
906615.  Fri May 04, 2012 6:36 am Reply with quote

I wasn't going to mention masturbation on the toilet cubicle walls, but it just burst out.

 
bemahan
906626.  Fri May 04, 2012 6:48 am Reply with quote

Neotenic wrote:
...masturbation on the toilet cubicle walls...

Sounds painful. I hope they aren't artexed, or is that the point*?

*A very sore point, I should imagine.

 
Neotenic
906663.  Fri May 04, 2012 7:29 am Reply with quote

It's fine once you build up the calluses.

 
'yorz
906678.  Fri May 04, 2012 7:52 am Reply with quote

<winces>

 
filofax
906683.  Fri May 04, 2012 8:19 am Reply with quote

Italians are extremely relaxed about nudity. Changing rooms and showers are always communal (in my experience), beaches are all topless and many are nudist, breastfeeding in public is positively BEAMED upon.. and this in the home of Catholicism. (Italians are also pretty open about sharing details of their bodily functions with you, which I'm not so keen on, but never mind).

Only once has anyone commented negatively on my breastfeeding in a restaurant, and that was by a frenchman, who asked me to go to the ladies to feed. I told him that I would be happy to serve my baby's dinner in the toilets if he was happy to eat his own there, and he went off quite subdued.
Otherwise, most people smile at you fondly.

I'm sure that my son will shortly be checking out porn, but at least in the meantime he know what real human bodies look like with no clothes on, so at least he won't think that Playboy is the norm.

 
PDR
906689.  Fri May 04, 2012 8:51 am Reply with quote

It's not the images in porn that are the problem - it's the activities and the behaviours. If you actually sample the videos that are freely available on non-paying porn sites you'll find that most of them show sexual relationships as coercive, abusive and one-sided. They show control and subjection rather than mutual enjoyment of intimacy.

I really think that the more libertarian-minded proponents could benefit from viewing the material to inform decisions about whether it would be a suitable introduction to the nature of future sexual relationships for (particularly) 12-14 year old boys.

If you don't know where to look then PM me and I'll suggest a couple (proof of age may be requested) - I don't think Jenny would appreciate it if I posted that sort of URL here!

PDR

 
'yorz
906700.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:06 am Reply with quote

It is my experience that you get what you ask for, to put it simply.

 
Oceans Edge
906702.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:10 am Reply with quote

there are a whole host of websites and magazines and stories and novels and movies out there... non of them are particularly representative of the real world

whether you're talking about sex or "A Boy's Life"

I think largely it's that they're not the "introduction to the nature of future sexual relationships for (particularly) 12-14 year old boys" (or girls) and I think part of the point of the discussion - is that they're not experiencing this in a vacuum. There's a whole host of other social influences at work here: home, school, friends, and I think largely that those influences will inevitably have a greater impact on the development of the child's social and sexual understanding.

I think the idea that viewing pictures of asian rope/bondage art is going to turn all our young men into weird DsM fetishist (and I know quite a few very nice normal Dsm Fetishists - no disrespect intended) is as silly as saying reading horror comics was going to turn us all into ax murders or playing DandD was going to make us all sword wielding goons with no grip on reality.

I feel quite confident in saying that YES those things DO happen - but in every case, it didn't happen BECAUSE of, but rather it was the trigger that exposed an underlying problem in those other far more influential social norms mentors.

 
Sadurian Mike
906707.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:20 am Reply with quote

Oceans Edge wrote:
or playing DandD was going to make us all sword wielding goons with no grip on reality.

I'm alright because I always cast the Protection from Mental Weakness spell before each role-playing session.

 
Neotenic
906710.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:22 am Reply with quote

Quote:
If you actually sample the videos that are freely available on non-paying porn sites you'll find that most of them show sexual relationships as coercive, abusive and one-sided. They show control and subjection rather than mutual enjoyment of intimacy.


Sure, there is most certainly an element of that type of thing out there - but I would definitely question the assertation that it is the norm.

If you were talking about what could be termed as 'Hollywood' porn - the ones with the ladies that are mostly silicon, then maybe it is indeed more common - but that type of material is now a diminishing proportion of that which is available for the discerning skin enthusiast.

As an aside, I do think it is notable that those who have expressed the more negative opinions towards the availability, or content, of pornography on this thread are those that are also the parents of young girls.

 
filofax
906713.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:31 am Reply with quote

I tend towards PDR's opinion here. Nothing wrong with nudity, nothing wrong with sex - but there's lots of stuff out there which is, quite frankly, disturbing, and young kids are not necessary equipped to deal with it yet.

I agree with Oceans Edge that a happy, balanced boy in a happy, balanced family will probably not be swayed into 'different' sexual practices only through viewing porn, but that isn't really the point.

Whatever a child is doing has to be age appropriate. There are books that I wouldn't be happy for him to read at this age, and there is porn I wouldn't want him to view right now. Children need sensible guidelines.

Edited to add: I hasten to add that I am NOT against porn, and I am NOT against filoboy checking it out. I would just want to be sure that it wasn't extreme.

 
'yorz
906715.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:37 am Reply with quote

Which brings us back to the OP. It's the parents' responsibility to provide these sensible guidelines, along with using the tools available to prevent inappropriate viewing. To leave all that to the government is nonsense, and indeed sets a very bad example for the child.

 
exnihilo
906716.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:38 am Reply with quote

One man's extreme is another man's normal.

I expect many of the people who would be okay, if not ecstatic, about their children viewing heterosexual pornography in their teens would be far less lackadaisical about them viewing homosexual pornography at the same age.

And that's before we get anywhere near ropes, fruit or kitchen appliances.

 
filofax
906717.  Fri May 04, 2012 9:45 am Reply with quote

Of course, but there must be some things which are beyond the pale for all parents....rape, violence, subjugation, degradation - any right thinking parent of a 12 year old is going to keep him away from that, regardless of whether or not they themselves practice any of the above.

All of the rest is, as you say, and individual choice dependent on personal morality, and no parent is going to teach a child anything which goes against their own principals. Therefore, if you object to homosexuality, the likelihood is that you will try to influence your kid against it. Not much anyone can do about that, is there?

 

Page 6 of 7
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are GMT - 5 Hours


Display posts from previous:   

Search Search Forums

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group