View previous topic | View next topic

S Fry not the smartarse l thought he was.

Page 3 of 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3

Jenny
27392.  Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:55 am Reply with quote

But his skin isn't black, is it? It's very dark brown.

On the other hand, my skin isn't white either. It's kind of beigy pinkish.

 
Anna
27398.  Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:01 am Reply with quote

I'm not arguing from a pedantic point of view. No-one's skin is 'black' but as far as skin colour goes, David's skin is what we consider black.

 
Pyreo
27410.  Wed Oct 19, 2005 10:42 am Reply with quote

It would be a tad awkward and time-consuming to have describe people's skin individually as 'dark brown' or 'beigy pinkish'.

 
JumpingJack
27479.  Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:41 pm Reply with quote

Really the Race Relations people should take this in hand. If you can have fine-tuned paint colour charts why not skin tones?

The native Australian's flesh could be 'brark' and Jenny's could be 'peige' or 'bink'.

Or possibly 'Liquorice Espresso' and 'Budleigh Salterton Sunrise'.

 
laidbacklazyman
27494.  Thu Oct 20, 2005 2:10 am Reply with quote

JumpingJack wrote:


The native Australian's flesh could be 'brark' and Jenny's could be 'peige' or 'bink'.


If that were the case, we'd all be speaking South African, and then how would we tell who the pub managers were.

 
Mostly Harmless
27507.  Thu Oct 20, 2005 4:22 am Reply with quote

..


Last edited by Mostly Harmless on Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:18 pm; edited 1 time in total

 
Natalie
27539.  Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:42 am Reply with quote

Better make sure we say pedant correctly, otherwise there could be an uproar.

 
Saxmachine
64583.  Mon Apr 10, 2006 4:49 am Reply with quote

brackett wrote:
Is that how Stephen pronounced the word? What an absolute dickhead! I've lost all respect for the man.


If your respect is lost that easily, I doubt Mr Fry is particularly bothered that he has.

Oh the wondrous mutual exclusivity of sarcasm and the internet!

 
Natalie
64633.  Mon Apr 10, 2006 9:04 am Reply with quote

Bothered that he has what?

The problem is, that sarcasm can be interpreted wrongly. What I mean is - Someone may write something and not mean it to be sarcastic, but someone else reads it sarcastically, and there's ya problem.

 
Saxmachine
65096.  Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:22 pm Reply with quote

I wrote:
If your respect is lost that easily, I doubt Mr Fry is particularly bothered that he has.


Natalie wrote:
Bothered that he has what?


Lost your [Brackett's] respect.

Well, the real problem with sarcasm is that it is communicated entirely through paralinguisitic features such as tone of voice, facial expression and general body language. Needless to say these are not communicable through the interweb sans camera/mic..

Sax

 

Page 3 of 3
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are GMT - 5 Hours


Display posts from previous:   

Search Search Forums

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group